A new study of the federal voucher program in the District of Columbia finds that private schools that accept students using the government tuition aid have more racial integration than the city鈥檚 public schools.
At the same time, the report鈥檚 authors detected no academic impact on nearby public schools after the program鈥檚 first year. Some voucher advocates argue that one benefit of the aid for private school tuition is that it may pressure public schools to improve.
鈥淸T]he participating private schools were much less likely to be racially homogeneous鈥� than the city鈥檚 public schools, said Jay P. Greene, an education professor at the University of Arkansas and a senior fellow at the New York City-based Manhattan Institute. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not as if integration in the participating private schools is wonderful, but it鈥檚 less bad.鈥�
The study was jointly issued Jan. 18 by the Manhattan Institute, a think tank that generally backs vouchers, and Georgetown University鈥檚 School Choice Demonstration Project. It鈥檚 part of a series of independent studies of the federal voucher program designed to augment and complement a federally funded evaluation, which is headed by the Georgetown project.
is available from the .
The new study looked at the initial effects of the Opportunity Scholarship Program, which provides vouchers worth up to $7,500. During the 2004-05 academic year, about 1,000 students participated. The vouchers may be used to attend participating secular and religious private schools in Washington.
About half the participating private schools had student populations that were at least 90 percent racially homogeneous, the study says. By contrast, 85 percent of the District of Columbia鈥檚 public schools have at least 90 percent racial homogeneity.
The study also compared the racial makeup of the schools with the overall population of the Washington metropolitan area, encompassing the city and its Maryland and Virginia suburbs, which the report says is approximately 57 percent nonwhite. Voucher recipients, however, must live in Washington and attend private schools in the city.
For purposes of the analysis, all nonwhite students were considered in the same category
The study found that 鈥渧ery few鈥� public school students in the city attend schools that approximate the area鈥檚 racial balance, while private school students are 鈥渟omewhat more likely鈥� to be enrolled in such schools.
Competitive Effect Studied
Still, the study offers cautions. 鈥淚t is important to emphasize that, on average, neither public schools nor private schools in D.C. appear to have achieved what most people would consider racial integration,鈥� the authors write.
Of those students who used vouchers to attend private schools in the 2004-05 academic year, 94 percent were African-American, the study notes.
The report also examined whether the voucher program was having any academic effect on public schools that were near private schools taking in voucher recipients. Their conclusion? In a word, no. There was neither a positive nor a negative impact.
But Mr. Greene says this isn鈥檛 surprising. 鈥淭he [voucher] program was essentially designed not to produce an effect [on public schools] one way or another, and sure enough, that鈥檚 exactly what we found,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hat doesn鈥檛 mean there won鈥檛 be over time.鈥�
For example, public schools face little or no financial impact from the loss of students to the private schools, Mr. Greene said. Also, he added, the program鈥檚 small size limits its impact.
Chad J. d鈥橢ntremont, the assistant director of the Center for the Study of Privatization in Education at Teachers College, Columbia University, called the study 鈥渨ell done鈥� overall. 鈥淭here鈥檚 an effort to fairly present the evidence,鈥� he said. 鈥淭he program really isn鈥檛 far enough along to be fully evaluated.鈥�
He said other research suggests that the academic impact of competition on public schools is minimal. 鈥淭he benefits are very modest, and you have to weigh in both the social and financial costs,鈥� he said.
Susan Nogan, a senior policy analyst at the National Education Association, which opposes vouchers, rejected the notion that competition will improve public schools. She also questioned the idea of using vouchers to promote racial and ethnic integration.
鈥淲hile integration is absolutely a worthy objective, we shouldn鈥檛 be using federal funds to help private schools achieve it, particularly when it comes at the expense of public schools,鈥� she said.
