Ķvlog

Federal

AFT Cites Hiring Policies as Hitches in School Staffing

By Vaishali Honawar — July 12, 2007 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Includes updates and/or revisions.

Teachers’ unions are often criticized as standing in the way of school progress on the grounds that their contracts make it harder for districts to staff troubled schools with the most suitable teachers.

But in a , the American Federation of Teachers calls on districts—along with the unions—to review their own hiring and placement practices as possible reasons for the delays in finding the best teachers for hard-to-staff schools.

“There’s an assumption that unions are the ones bringing the timeline [during the collective bargaining process], but actually it may be the school district that brings the timeline, and the union maybe just agrees with it,” said Richelle Patterson, an assistant director of educational issues with the nation’s second-largest teachers’ union.

Districts and union locals together should take a closer look at notification and assignment policies and candidate-screening tools, among other measures, to see if changes are needed, she added.

In recent years, debate has intensified around the role collective bargaining contracts can sometimes play in delaying teacher recruitment at challenging schools. A much-publicized said hard-to-staff districts lose opportunities to hire strong teacher-candidates because of holdups caused or worsened by policies requiring schools to hire all transfers before making new job offers.

The Bush administration this year included a provision in its reauthorization blueprint for the No Child Left Behind Act that would allow district officials to override contracts while staffing the most troubled schools. (“Administration Wants Districts Free to Transfer Teachers,” March 21, 2007.)

The AFT report, released at the 1.3 million-member union’s , identifies a number of problems that cause teachers to shy away from some schools, including student-discipline issues, lack of on-site support, poor administrative leadership, inadequate, ongoing professional development, and insufficient preparation and planning time. It recommends that unions and districts work together to address the problems.

Teachers, the report says, are attracted to, and are most likely to remain in, safe schools with supportive administrators where teachers have influence over school decisions and programs, and where they have opportunities to develop professionally.

Ongoing Support Crucial

The report highlights a mix of strategies that locals and districts can work on together, including examples of districts that have successfully implemented them. For example, in Toledo, Ohio, the district and the union worked together to start a program in which three teachers who are specialists in behavior management are available to respond to student referrals from classroom teachers. The Chattanooga, Tenn., district offers its teachers incentives to teach in its lowest-performing schools, including free tuition toward a master’s degree in urban education.

Maximizing targeted professional-development opportunities for teachers, smoothing the transfer of the most accomplished teachers to hard-to-staff schools, and giving teachers strategies to deal with instructional challenges are among other recommendations.

“There are some places that don’t think about hard-to-staff schools; they don’t think these are issues of concern that need to be addressed,” Ms. Patterson said. “We hope this will start a conversation where there hasn’t been one before.”

Experts who have studied teacher recruitment and retention in challenging schools agree that im-proving conditions at such sites is critical.

Eric Hirsch, a consultant with the New Teacher Center, a nonprofit group based at the University of California, Santa Cruz, that provides support to new teachers and principals, had not seen the AFT report at the time of the interview. But he echoed some of the problems the report cites, such as lack of community support, weak school leadership, and discipline problems, that cause teachers to leave or avoid such schools.

Mr. Hirsch, who worked for the Center for Teaching Quality, in Chapel Hill, N.C., until last month, found that salary and signing bonuses are important to lure teachers to hard-to-staff schools, but that teachers are looking more for supportive leadership, collaborative colleagues, and professional development.

Induction, he said, is also extremely important, “so we don’t continually throw Ķvlog in school and watch them leave because they are unprepared.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the July 18, 2007 edition of Education Week

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Managing AI in Schools: Practical Strategies for Districts
How should districts govern AI in schools? Learn practical strategies for policies, safety, transparency, as well as responsible adoption.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by 
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Federal Tracker See Which Ed. Dept. Programs Are Moving to New Agencies: A Tracker
K-12 and higher education programs are heading to new agencies as part of Trump administration downsizing.
1 min read
Photo collaged image of the U.S. Department of Education shattering.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + AP + Getty
Federal Meet the Trump Cabinet Secretaries Taking Over Ed. Dept. Programs
The U.S. Department of Education is shifting more than 100 programs to other federal agencies.
1 min read
President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, on March 26, 2026, in Washington.
President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, on March 26, 2026, in Washington. Six Cabinet members are now on track to have a hand in managing U.S. Department of Education programs.
Alex Brandon/AP
Federal Trump Admin. Sues Minnesota Over Transgender Athletes in Girls' Sports
It's the third state the Trump administration has sued over transgender participation in athletics.
2 min read
Attorney General Pam Bondi in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Feb. 20, 2026, in Washington.
Attorney General Pam Bondi in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Feb. 20, 2026, in Washington. The Justice Department under Bondi has now sued three states over policies allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls' sports
Alex Brandon/AP
Federal Trump Administration to Move Dept. of Ed. Out of Its Longtime Offices
The move follows a year of efforts to dismantle the federal agency.
2 min read
The U.S. Department of Education building is pictured on Oct. 24, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Department of Education building is pictured on Oct. 24, 2025, in Washington, D.C. The agency said Thursday it will move to a different building starting this summer.
Maansi Srivastava for Education Week