Four years ago this month, the House of Representatives delivered on one of President Bush鈥檚 top objectives when it approved the first draft of the No Child Left Behind Act. The Senate followed suit in June of that year. By December 2001, the final package was headed to the president鈥檚 desk.
Fast-forward to the present, and it鈥檚 striking how little attention Mr. Bush鈥檚 recent plans to expand the No Child Left Behind law at the high school level have gotten on Capitol Hill.
House Republican leaders on education made clear this month they won鈥檛 be taking legislative action on the package in 2005. A spokesman for Republicans on the Senate education committee said that panel, too, has other pressing priorities that make action improbable this year.
Instead, Congress appears about to complete work on one major education bill the president didn鈥檛 even want: the reauthorization of the federal vocational education law. Mr. Bush had hoped to divert all the money authorized under the popular law to his high school agenda, but lawmakers have shown no appetite for that strategy.
鈥淲e expect we will have a number of hearings [on high school improvement] throughout this year,鈥� Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee and a staunch defender of the No Child Left Behind Act, said when asked about the president鈥檚 high school agenda recently.
鈥淏efore we go out and begin to call for [more] assessments, given the current requirements, I think we need to take a look at what is happening out there,鈥� Rep. Boehner said during a May 5 press conference.
Speaking at the same event, Rep. Michael N. Castle, R-Del., who chairs the Education Reform Subcommittee, added of the Bush approach: 鈥淔rankly, there鈥檚 political opposition to it, and it鈥檚 not just Democrats. It鈥檚 within the Republican Party as well. And sometimes you have to go through a massaging process before you can overcome those political constraints.鈥�
He added, 鈥淢aybe next year, I don鈥檛 know when, there鈥檚 the possibility of legislation.鈥�
Sending Signals
Although President Bush made education a bigger focus of his first-term presidential bid, he often promoted his plans to expand testing and accountability at the high school level on the 2004 campaign trail. And shortly after his re-election, he made clear that he expected action in Congress.
鈥淚鈥檝e earned [political] capital in this election, and I鈥檓 going to spend it,鈥� he said in November. 鈥淵ou鈥檝e heard the agenda: Social Security and tax reform, moving this economy forward, education, fighting and winning the war on terror.鈥� (鈥淏ush鈥檚 School Agenda Will Get a 2nd Term,鈥� Nov. 10, 2004.)
Mr. Bush has called for testing students each year in grades 9-11 in mathematics and reading. Under the No Child Left Behind Act, states must administer such tests only once in high school. He also called for creating a $1.2 billion High School Intervention Fund to help improve high schools.
Yet, despite his postelection comments, the president himself seems to have invested little political capital in his high school agenda this year. He鈥檚 spent months across the country promoting his goals for changes in the Social Security system, but rarely says much about his high school agenda.
鈥淭he signals that the president sends by use of his own time and his own words matter on Capitol Hill,鈥� said Norman J. Ornstein, an expert on politics at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington think tank. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e not determinative, 鈥� but they鈥檙e very important, and if [lawmakers] don鈥檛 have a sense that this is really at the top of the priority list, then they鈥檙e going to turn to other things.鈥�
The high school initiative faces other impediments.
鈥淭here鈥檚 unrest about the No Child Left Behind Act, and that鈥檚 translating into opposition to Bush鈥檚 high school proposal,鈥� said Jack Jennings, the president of the Center on Education Policy in Washington, and a former senior aide to House Democrats on education.
He added: 鈥淚鈥檓 sure Bush cares about this, but he鈥檚 not putting energy into it, and his secretary [of education] is so busy putting out wildfires on No Child Left Behind that she can鈥檛 put her time into it.鈥�
Just this month, Utah鈥檚 governor signed a bill declaring that Utah education laws take priority over federal law. And Connecticut鈥檚 attorney general recently threatened to sue the federal government over the No Child Left Behind Act鈥檚 testing mandates.
But Susan Aspey, a spokeswoman for Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, said the Bush administration isn鈥檛 throwing in the towel.
鈥淭he secretary is aggressively on the road making the case that students need better preparation at the high school level to succeed in college and the workforce,鈥� Ms. Aspey said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e still vigorously pursuing the elements contained within the president鈥檚 proposal.鈥�
Losing Strategy?
And then there鈥檚 the issue of money. Analysts say the White House didn鈥檛 exactly pick a winning strategy by proposing to pay for its high school plans with money now dedicated to the politically popular Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act. That approach irked both Republicans and Democrats.
On May 4, the House overwhelmingly passed a reauthorization of the law, about two months after the Senate approved a similar bill, 99-0. The bills are headed to a House-Senate conference committee to resolve the differences. (鈥淗ouse Approves Perkins Reauthorization,鈥� May 11, 2005.)
At the same time, Rep. Castle expressed sympathy for the thrust of President Bush鈥檚 high school agenda at the press conference earlier this month.
鈥淚 happen to believe, philosophically, in what the president is saying,鈥� he said. 鈥淚f you鈥檙e going to have No Child Left Behind, you do need to extend it out until the end of high school at some point, but I鈥檓 not exactly sure how to do that.鈥�
The prospects don鈥檛 appear any better on the other side of the Capitol, where Sen. Michael B. Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, is the chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.
鈥淪enator Enzi has made several other education issues the first priority,鈥� said Craig Orfield, a spokesman for the panel鈥檚 Republicans, noting major reauthorization bills on vocational education, higher education, and the Head Start preschool program.
鈥淗e鈥檚 also aware,鈥� Mr. Orfield said, 鈥渢hat there are very differing opinions about No Child Left Behind.鈥�
Mr. Orfield predicted that it would be next year before the Senate committee might take any action related to President Bush鈥檚 high school plans.
Sen. Enzi, he said, 鈥渨ants to take his time to really assess the changes that are being proposed.鈥�
