The fat years for state budgets are over for this decade, a new nationwide analysis says鈥攁nd that could spell trouble for future funding of K-12 education.
Although state fiscal conditions remain solid, , released at the group鈥檚 annual meeting here Aug. 5-9, suggests that states鈥� revenues already have peaked, and that officials are destined for some financial belt-tightening.
That鈥檚 likely to put education leaders on guard, since K-12 aid makes up about 50 percent of states鈥� budgets, and a number of states have relied on the favorable fiscal climate of recent years to increase public school funding.
鈥淓vidence indicates that [fiscal] 2006 was the peak for state fiscal health this decade,鈥� according to the report, written by Corina Eckl and Ron Snell of the NCSL Fiscal Affairs Program. The annual report covers fiscal 2007, which ended on June 30 in most states, and the 2008 budget year. 鈥淭he trend is downward,鈥� it says.
The survey includes budget data from 45 states; California, Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin had not completed their budgets in time for the report. Since those states are mostly large, with big budgets, and three are in the struggling Great Lakes region, NCSL fiscal experts expect the national outlook to grow a bit dimmer when the five are included.
States鈥� year-end balances鈥攐r how much financial cushion they鈥檙e carrying forward to the next budget year鈥攁re dropping. Aggregate year-end balances fell 7 percent from fiscal 2006 to the end of fiscal 2007. Those balances are expected to fall again by 24 percent from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008.
Housing Slump a Factor
The explanation for the fall, according to the report, is that states are enacting tax cuts and seeing weaker revenue projections, while their spending is growing. Contributing to the situation is the slump in the housing market.
Read the accompanying story,
Education has been one of the beneficiaries, meanwhile, of spending growth. In fact, 20 states during their 2007 legislative sessions used unexpected funds鈥攅ither leftover money from previous years or higher-than-projected revenue鈥攖o increase spending on schools. Total state spending on K-12 education is expected to grow nearly 10 percent this fiscal year, compared with the 8.1 percent in growth budgeted for state spending on Medicaid鈥攖he fast-growing health-care program for the elderly, the poor, and people with disabilities.
But much of the growth in education spending, especially among states that saw significant jumps in K-12 aid, is due to changes in how schools are funded, and not necessarily a result of new programs or reform measures. Texas, for example, increased school spending by 32 percent, in part to further decrease school district property-tax rates, according to the report. Connecticut boosted spending by nearly 15 percent to help offset the K-12 spending burden shouldered by towns. Alaska鈥檚 nearly 26 percent increase is largely attributed to rising teacher-retirement costs.
鈥極n Autopilot鈥�
In Arizona, most of the additional $335 million in school funding legislators set aside in the newly enacted budget covers student growth in that fast-growing state, said Sen. Robert Burns, a Republican and the chairman of the Senate appropriations committee.
鈥淎 lot of our budget is on autopilot,鈥� he said.
David Wyss, the chief economist for the New York City-based Standard & Poor鈥檚, who addressed legislators in an NCSL session last week, predicts that the decisions on education will only get tougher. States will face increasing financial pressures, he said, as the housing market continues its slump, energy prices stay high, and baby boomers retire and start collecting on promised state-funded pensions and health-care benefits.
鈥淚 can see this clash between education funding and health-care funding,鈥� Mr. Wyss said, adding, 鈥淚 would rather invest in the future鈥濃�攎eaning in education.
Budget troubles are forcing Florida lawmakers to return to work next month for a special session to close a $1.5 billion spending gap in a $71 billion state budget鈥攖he result of still-dropping home sales and a decline in sales-tax revenue, according to a report unveiled earlier this month by state economists.
Preliminary estimates by the Florida Department of Education show that $700 million could be cut from K-12 spending to help reduce the deficit.
Maryland also is facing tough choices. The state will have a $1.4 billion budget deficit by fiscal 2009, Sheila E. Hixson, the Democratic chairwoman of the Maryland House of Delegates鈥� ways and means committee, told fellow legislators. And that鈥檚 only the amount needed to maintain stable funding for services, without giving increases to important state priorities such as education.
Maryland鈥檚 K-12 budget for fiscal 2008 is $6 billion, up by about $1.5 billion since fiscal 2002鈥攖he biggest driver of increased spending in Maryland, Delegate Hixson said. Now, she said, legislators will have to find more money to sustain the higher school funding鈥攂y raising taxes; creating new sources of revenue, such as gambling; cutting other programs; or some combination of those strategies.
鈥淭here鈥檚 no question 鈥� [increasing school aid] will greatly benefit schools,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e still have a big obstacle to overcome: We have to find a way to pay for it.鈥�
