Ķvlog

Law & Courts

Judge Ends School Desegregation Order at Trump Administration’s Request

By Patrick Wall, The Times-Picayune | The New Orleans Advocate — January 07, 2026 4 min read
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill speaks during a press conference on Monday, Aug. 5, 2024, in Baton Rouge, La. Murrill teamed up with the Trump administration to ask a judge to end a decades-old desegregation order under which the state's DeSoto Parish Schools were under federal oversight.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

A federal judge closed a long-running school desegregation case in DeSoto Parish on Monday, less than a week after the U.S. Department of Justice, the Louisiana attorney general, and the DeSoto Parish School Board asked the court to dismiss the case and release the schools from federal oversight.

It is the second decades-old desegregation case in Louisiana brought to a swift end by the Trump administration and state Attorney General Liz Murrill, who last year had a case in Plaquemines Parish dating back to the 1960s dismissed. Murrill and Gov. Jeff Landry, both Republicans, have vowed to fight for other remaining desegregation orders to be lifted, with Landry assuring school systems last year that “there is an end in sight.”

About a dozen Louisiana school districts remain under longstanding desegregation orders, which often require them to submit regular compliance reports and seek court approval for changes, such as school closures or new attendance zones, that could affect schools’ racial balance. Historically, the Justice Department has monitored districts’ compliance with the orders and, in some cases, opposed efforts by Louisiana school boards to have the cases dismissed.

But the federal government has done an about-face since President Donald Trump returned to office last year, pressing courts to wind down several of the cases. State and federal officials say the desegregation orders are no longer necessary because the school districts long ago stopped discriminating against students by race, adding that the ongoing oversight drains school resources and undermines local control.

“The school boards are deprived of their ability to actually govern when a federal judge is supervising an old consent decree,” Murrill said Tuesday. “I’m grateful to the Trump administration’s Department of Justice for being willing to really look at this and join us in ending cases that need to be ended.”

Civil rights groups have opposed efforts to lift the remaining orders, arguing that persistent racial disparities in some Louisiana schools—in areas such as student discipline, building quality, and access to advanced courses—suggest the indirect effects of past segregation have not been fully addressed. They argue that courts should examine the present-day conditions in each school district before agreeing to dismiss the cases.

“Even when the parties jointly move to say there’s no more discrimination, the court has its own obligation to look at its orders and say, ‘Did they comply with everything they’re supposed to do?’” said Deuel Ross, litigation director at the Legal Defense Fund, a New York-based nonprofit representing the plaintiffs in several of the Louisiana desegregation cases, but not DeSoto Parish.

Swift end to an old case

Until this week, DeSoto Parish Schools, a small district south of Shreveport, had operated under desegregation orders for nearly 60 years.

The U.S. Department of Justice sued the school board in 1967 for maintaining racially segregated schools for more than a decade after the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the practice in its 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. The orders required the district to eliminate any “vestiges of segregation,” including in how students are assigned to schools and where new schools are constructed.

The Justice Department and the Shreveport-based federal court overseeing the case have closely monitored the district’s actions over the years, including when it shut down a historically Black high school in 2013 and when some families were allegedly sending their children to schools outside of their attendance zones, according to court documents. As recently as 2024, Justice Department officials toured all nine of DeSoto Parish’s schools and interviewed administrators.

About 40% of the district’s students are Black and 50% are white, but most schools don’t reflect that diversity, according to state enrollment data. Three schools in Mansfield are around 90% Black, while schools in North DeSoto are majority white. District officials have said the school enrollments reflect where families live, not district policies.

Last June, the DeSoto Parish School Board brought on Murrill’s office as co-counsel in hopes the state would pursue a quick resolution to the case as it had in Plaquemines Parish. At the time, Superintendent Clay Corley said the federal monitoring created extra work for the district, which had to produce annual compliance reports.

“It’s a stack of stuff, a box full of data we send every year,” he told the news station KTBS, adding that “everything has to be blessed” by federal officials. Corley did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

On Dec. 30, the Justice Department, Murrill’s office, and the school board’s private attorneys filed a joint motion asking U.S. District Court Judge S. Maurice Hicks Jr. to dismiss the case. Hicks, who was nominated by former President George W. Bush, granted the motion on Jan. 5.

In less than a week, without any public hearing or fanfare, the nearly six-decade-old case was closed.

Copyright (c) 2026, .Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Smarter Tools, Stronger Outcomes: Empowering CTE Educators With Future-Ready Solutions
Open doors to meaningful, hands-on careers with research-backed insights, ideas, and examples of successful CTE programs.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Improve Reading Comprehension: Three Tools for Working Memory Challenges
Discover three working memory workarounds to help your students improve reading comprehension and empower them on their reading journey.
Content provided by 
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Trump's Education Policies Spurred 72 Lawsuits in 2025. How Many Is He Winning?
The legal challenges show which policies have had a big impact and how 2026 could go.
5 min read
President Donald Trump holds up an executive order after signing it at an indoor Presidential Inauguration parade event in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up an executive order after signing it at an indoor presidential inauguration parade event in Washington on Jan. 20, 2025. Trump's executive actions prompted legal challenges virtually from the moment he took office, and education-related policies were not immune.
Matt Rourke/AP
Law & Courts From Ten Commandments to Tariffs: A Fall Legal Roundup
Key court cases on transgender rights, religion, speech, and policy could reshape U.S. schools.
7 min read
Photo illustration of legal books, scales and gavel.
iStock
Law & Courts How One Lawyer Helped Reshape Special Education at the Supreme Court
A documentary follows a lawyer behind major Supreme Court wins for students with disabilities.
9 min read
Roman Martinez, an attorney with Latham & Watkins, is featured in the Bloomberg Law documentary 'Supreme Advocacy.'
Roman Martinez, a Washington lawyer who has played a role in four U.S. Supreme Court cases about the rights of special education students, is featured in the Bloomberg Law documentary "Supreme Advocacy."
via YouTube
Law & Courts Supreme Court Weighs IQ Tests and Other School Records in Key Death Penalty Case
The court weighs the proper role of IQ tests for defendants claiming an intellectual disability.
8 min read
IQ test, paper sheet with test answer on the table
iStock/Getty