糖心动漫vlog

Opinion
Law & Courts Opinion

It鈥檚 Time to Teach Our Ugly American History

By Joseph McGill 鈥 September 07, 2017 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

The preservation of historic buildings is a method of showcasing a history in which we, the American people, take pride. What鈥檚 often missing in this story are the people from whom I and many others in our nation derived their DNA: the enslaved.

Since founding the Slave Dwelling Project in 2010, which helps to preserve surviving slave quarters, I have spent nights at nearly 100 slave dwellings in 19 states and the District of Columbia. The purpose of these sleepovers, which I lead for students, 糖心动漫vlog, and other individuals, is to bring much-needed attention to these buildings. Seeing and entering these physical structures makes it hard to deny the presence of the people who occupied them and provides a much-needed opportunity to learn about chattel slavery.

It's Time to Teach Our Ugly American History: Removing Confederate monuments won't solve our problems

I apply that same thinking to Confederate monuments. As an African-American, my position is rare. Last month鈥檚 violent white nationalist rally over the proposed removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee, in Charlottesville, Va., re-energized the movement to remove controversial statues, monuments, and plaques devoted to the Civil War. Mayors in Baltimore; Gainesville, Fla.; and other cities did just that. And, in some cases, such as in Durham, N.C., protesters pulled down statues themselves.

From the end of the Civil War through the civil rights movement, monuments and other symbols of the Confederacy were erected to commemorate a lost cause and the soldiers who fought for it. They were also used to intimidate African-American citizens.

Despite the controversy, I support leaving them in place.

Here鈥檚 why: They tell us a lot about an American history shaped by white supremacy. Just as in my work leading tours of slave dwellings, educating others about this history is our chance to change the narrative. But now that our nation has embarked on this slippery slope of sanitizing our past, where will it stop?

Our founding fathers created a system of slavery far more brutal than any before it. From the time the first enslaved person from Africa arrived unwillingly in Jamestown, Va., in 1619 to the Civil War鈥檚 end in 1865, chattel slavery (in which an enslaved individual鈥檚 descendants were also property) prospered. Chattel slavery was sanctioned by this nation鈥檚 religious institutions, universities, and lawmakers, which ensured its longevity. Forty-one signers of the Declaration of Independence were slave owners, as well as 12 U.S. presidents鈥攅ight of them while in office.

All states now have the opportunity to examine the uglier side of all that we hold dear.

Even after the Revolutionary War, when Northern states began to abolish slavery, the residents of these states still reaped its benefits and condoned its existence. Their complicity was in owning the banks, insurance companies, and factories that profited from the cotton picked by the enslaved. Even institutions of higher learning have roots in slavery. Georgetown University, for example, formally apologized earlier this year for its involvement in selling 272 slaves in the 1800s to pay off debts.

Erasing history has always been a part of how Americans have dealt with the atrocities of the past. There aren鈥檛 many buildings or statues that denote lynching, the genocide of Native Americans, World War II鈥檚 Japanese internment camps, and other horrific actions because we are not proud of them. Some proponents of monument removal would argue that the violent roots of the Confederacy justify why its commemorations should disappear. But I would argue that removal doesn鈥檛 solve our problems.

In fact, scrubbing all visible traces of white supremacy from the landscape is nearly impossible and would mean we鈥檇 have few historical markers left. A 2016 report from scattered across the country. That number does not include the schools or national holidays that honor the Confederacy in some way. New Orleans, for example, took down four Confederate monuments in April but left in place the statue of Andrew Jackson, the person responsible for the Trail of Tears鈥攖he forced removal of Native Americans under the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Representations of the past, from the Jefferson Memorial to the Washington Monument, should instead focus on educating future generations about this country鈥檚 complicated history. We need to change the narrative of our nation. Removing monuments won鈥檛 do that. We must tell our students the good, the bad, and the ugly of our past. And in the case of those who fought for the Confederacy, we shouldn鈥檛 hide the numbers of slaves they owned or the uniforms that they wore.

All states now have the opportunity to examine the uglier side of all that we hold dear. If we鈥檙e going all the way, let鈥檚 rid ourselves of the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Ala. Let鈥檚 stop singing the National Anthem鈥檚 racist third verse. Let鈥檚 take the 鈥淣鈥 word out of Huckleberry Finn. And anything memorializing the slave-owning white supremacists who signed the Declaration of Independence, including Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, must go.

If the unfortunate incidents of Charlottesville, Va., are any indication, future generations will soon side with those who believe that all these monuments should be removed from public places. Instead of erasing history, why don鈥檛 we educate our students about it honestly?

A version of this article appeared in the September 13, 2017 edition of Education Week as We Must Teach Our Ugly Past, Not Erase It

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Smarter Tools, Stronger Outcomes: Empowering CTE Educators With Future-Ready Solutions
Open doors to meaningful, hands-on careers with research-backed insights, ideas, and examples of successful CTE programs.
Content provided by 
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Improve Reading Comprehension: Three Tools for Working Memory Challenges
Discover three working memory workarounds to help your students improve reading comprehension and empower them on their reading journey.
Content provided by 
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek鈥檚 nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions. Why That Matters for Education
The Supreme Court curtailed the power of federal courts to issue broad injunctions blocking policies, which may be relevant for education.
5 min read
Demonstrators demand the Supreme Court uphold the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all individuals born within the country's borders, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on May 15, 2025. The Court heard oral arguments on a temporary injunction in CASA v. Trump prohibiting the administration from enforcing his executive order revoking birthright citizenship while the case makes its way through the judicial system.
Demonstrators demand that the Supreme Court uphold the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which grants citizenship to all individuals born within the country's borders, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on May 15, 2025. The high court on June 27, 2025, allowed the Trump administration to largely implement President Donald Trump鈥檚 executive order ending birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrant parents.
Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds School E-Rate Program
The justices weighed a constitutional challenge to the funding mechanism for the $4 billion E-rate program for school internet projects.
5 min read
The computer lab is adjacent to the multi-purpose room with the Wifi dead spot on Friday, Oct. 23, 2020 in Greensboro, N.C.
The computer lab is adjacent to the multi-purpose room with the Wifi dead spot on Friday, Oct. 23, 2020, in Greensboro, N.C. The U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2025, upheld the federal government鈥檚 long-running program that helps provide low-cost internet services to public institutions such as schools and libraries.
Abby Gibbs/The News&Record via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Sides With Parents in LGBTQ+ Curriculum Opt-Out Case
The justices ruled in a case on whether parents with religious objections may excuse their children from some curriculum materials.
7 min read
Demonstrators are seen outside the Supreme Court as oral arguments were heard in Mahmoud v. Taylor on April 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C. The case contends that forcing students to participate in LGBTQ+ learning material violates First Amendment rights to exercise religious beliefs.
Demonstrators stand outside the Supreme Court as oral arguments are heard in <i>Mahmoud</i> v. <i>Taylor</i> on April 22, 2025, in Washington. The case contends that forcing students to be exposed to LGBTQ+ curricular material violates parents' First Amendment rights to exercise their religious beliefs.
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Rule on Major K-12 Education Cases Friday
The U.S. Supreme Court will issue its last opinions of the term, including on religious parents opting their children out of the curriculum
4 min read
People walk past the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on June 25, 2025.
People walk past the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., on June 25. The court on June 27 is expected to issue the last merits rulings of the term, including in several pending education cases.
Aaron Schwartz/Sipa via AP Images