Ķvlog

Opinion
Standards & Accountability Opinion

Student Test Scores Keep Falling. What’s Really to Blame?

As NAEP performance continues to decline, we must search for new explanations and solutions
By Martin R. West — September 09, 2025 5 min read
A stylized, faceless student has a smooth, open head with a glowing smartphone rising from it, symbolizing the smart phone and social media's impact on NAEP scores.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Ever since COVID-19 closed U.S. schools for in-person instruction in March 2020, questions about pandemic learning loss have shaped reactions to new data on student learning. How much did achievement fall while schools were closed? (The short answer: A lot.) Do we see signs of recovery? (For the most part, no.)

Yet the latest results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, also known as the or NAEP, illustrate how this COVID-centric lens distorts as much as it reveals.

Yes, science scores for 8th graders are down since 2019, the last time kids were tested in that subject. High school seniors have also lost ground in reading and math. But achievement in each of these subjects was already trending downward before the pandemic—and there’s no reason to expect a “return to normal,” or to pre-pandemic learning conditions, would stop or reverse these declines.

Twelfth grade reading scores hit a recent peak in 2009 and fell significantly over the following decade. Twelfth grade math peaked in 2013 and had also fallen by 2019. Eighth grade science scores held steady between 2015 and 2019, but the scores of 4th graders (who were not included in the latest round of science testing) fell over that same period.

This phenomenon of pre-pandemic learning loss is also evident in 8th grade math, 8th grade U.S. history, and in reading in both 4th and 8th grades. In math, pandemic-era disruptions clearly accelerated the downward trend. But the picture that emerges for reading and U.S. history is one of steady decline since the middle of the last decade. The pandemic hardly registers as a blip.

Pre-pandemic learning loss was steepest for the nation’s lowest-performing students, who also and now seem to be in free fall. In 8th grade reading, for example, scores at the 10th percentile fell by 10 points between 2013 and 2019 and by another 9 points between 2019 and 2024, with the total loss amounting to nearly two years’ worth of typical learning. Meanwhile, high-performing students held steady over this same period and, despite the pandemic, are scoring nearly as high as ever. The gap between the lowest-performing and highest-performing students is now widening across all subjects and grades, highlighting the stark reality that schools today are equipping only some students for postsecondary success.

If the pandemic is not solely to blame for our current woes, what is? The “nation’s report card” is designed to tell us what’s happening to student achievement rather than why, but the data can inform the search for culprits. Possible candidates should have emerged in the first half of the 2010s, plausibly affect learning across multiple subjects, and disproportionately harm low-performing students (while leaving high-performers mainly untouched). Given of widening achievement gaps in other developed countries, factors that transcend national boundaries merit special consideration.

To my knowledge the only candidate that checks all those boxes is the rise of smartphones and, in particular, the advent of social media platforms targeting youth. The timing . Phones distract students from math homework just as much . Surveys show that disadvantaged students spend the most time on their devices, while motivated students of all backgrounds may be able to use them to enhance their learning. New York University psychologist Jonathan Haidt that these technologies are a key driver of our current crisis in youth mental health. While we lack a definitive causal link between smartphones and learning, the circumstantial evidence is sufficiently strong to justify more experimentation with bell-to-bell phone bans in schools, as well as efforts to rein in students’ near-constant use of other digital devices while in class.

The 'nation’s report card' is designed to tell us what’s happening to student achievement rather than why, but the data can inform the search for culprits.

In addition to developing and testing strategies to protect students from their phones, policymakers need to consider ways to promote higher levels of learning going forward. Here it is worth looking to our past, when elected officials from both political parties came together around a reform agenda grounded in articulating clear standards for student learning and holding schools accountable for ensuring kids met those standards on state tests. That approach had plenty of critics but, when implemented first at the state level in the 1990s, and then taken nationally with the signing into law, in 2002, of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), : steadily rising levels of achievement driven by unusually large gains for low-performers—precisely the opposite of the pattern over the past decade. A loosening of that law’s provisions began around 2011 and may also have contributed to our recent backsliding.

I’m not advocating carbon copies of past reforms. We need to learn from what worked and what didn’t, including acknowledging an overemphasis under NCLB on subjects covered by state tests, like reading and math, at the expense of civics, history, and science instruction. That lopsided approach surely contributed to low scores in those other subjects on NAEP. The metrics used to gauge school performance need to and , not the inherent advantages and disadvantages students bring with them to school.

Policymakers and Ķvlog have urgent work to do, as do parents who play an especially critical role in their children’s education. Potential solutions to the chronic absenteeism crisis now afflicting our public schools require Ķvlog to to reemphasize the importance of regular attendance.

We must also find common ground on the smartphone issue. shows 93% of kids ages 13 to 17 have their own smartphones, up from 73% in 2014-15. Parents can set limits on how and when children use these devices. I’m a parent, my two older sons have phones, and I know just how hard that is. I take comfort in being able to reach my boys as needed, but I also understand and appreciate the call from experts to . Coupled with greater accountability around student achievement, it may be the single most important thing we can do to help our kids learn.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Smarter Tools, Stronger Outcomes: Empowering CTE Educators With Future-Ready Solutions
Open doors to meaningful, hands-on careers with research-backed insights, ideas, and examples of successful CTE programs.
Content provided by 
Reading & Literacy Webinar Supporting Older Struggling Readers: Tips From Research and Practice
Reading problems are widespread among adolescent learners. Find out how to help students with gaps in foundational reading skills.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Improve Reading Comprehension: Three Tools for Working Memory Challenges
Discover three working memory workarounds to help your students improve reading comprehension and empower them on their reading journey.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Standards & Accountability Opinion Do We Know How to Measure School Quality?
Current rating systems could be vastly improved by adding dimensions beyond test scores.
Van Schoales
6 min read
Benchmark performance, key performance indicator measurement, KPI analysis. Tiny people measure length of market chart bars with big ruler to check profit progress cartoon vector illustration
iStock/Getty Images
Standards & Accountability States Are Testing How Much Leeway They Can Get From Trump's Ed. Dept.
A provision in the Every Student Succeeds Act allows the secretary of education to waive certain state requirements.
7 min read
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 20, 2025.
Ben Curtis/AP
Standards & Accountability State Accountability Systems Aren't Actually Helping Schools Improve
The systems under federal education law should do more to shine a light on racial disparities in students' performance, a new report says.
6 min read
Image of a classroom under a magnifying glass.
Tarras79 and iStock/Getty
Standards & Accountability What the Research Says More than 1 in 4 Schools Targeted for Improvement, Survey Finds
The new federal findings show schools also continue to struggle with absenteeism.
2 min read
Vector illustration of diverse children, students climbing up on a top of a stack of staggered books.
iStock/Getty