To the Editor:
While the Trump administration appeared poised to eliminate or seriously cut funding for Head Start, as reported in the article, 鈥�Trump Allies Say the Case for Head Start Is Weak. Researchers Say They鈥檙e Wrong,鈥� (May 1, 2025), a recent poll has found that 79% of voters鈥攊ncluding 73% of Republicans鈥攕ay they .
In the same poll of more than 1,000 registered voters across the country, 72% said they 鈥渂elieve federal funding for child care and early learning programs for families with low incomes is a good investment of taxpayer money.鈥� And they are right.
Head Start鈥檚 impact goes far beyond improving language, literacy, and math skills in preschoolers. We see significant gains in , setting the stage for kindergarten readiness and sustained academic achievement. Crucially, when families are engaged with Head Start, the , according to a 2017 study. These are not merely statistics; these are children鈥檚 futures we are shaping.
As the EdWeek article states, Head Start currently serves nearly 800,000 children and families across all 50 states, providing essential health care, nutritious meals, and parent empowerment alongside early learning. While the White House preliminary budget proposal did not alter Head Start funding, proposed cuts to programs related to , , and will indirectly impact many Head Start families. These comprehensive support services are vital for children鈥檚 success beyond the hours they spend in Head Start.
Full funding of Head Start is not just about supporting children; it is about strengthening our nation鈥檚 social and economic fabric. The early investment pays dividends far exceeding the initial cost, building the foundation for a thriving society. We urge policymakers to listen to the Americans who recognize the profound value of Head Start and ensure its full funding, securing a brighter future for all.
Yasmina Vinci
Executive Director
National Head Start Association
Alexandria, Va.
