Ķvlog

Artificial Intelligence From Our Research Center

Schools Are Fielding Complaints Generated by AI. How You Can Tell

By Arianna Prothero — November 14, 2025 3 min read
Illustration of human arm pulling on strings of robot arm with pencil.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

More Ķvlog are getting complaints from parents that they suspect were written by AI. The problem, some Ķvlog say, is that AI-generated complaints can be very long, raising a litany of potential legal issues that then require more time—and even lawyers—to respond to.

How widespread is this problem? The EdWeek Research Center recently asked a nationally representative survey of teachers, principals, and district administrators that question.

Six percent of Ķvlog said they were certain a parent or student had used artificial intelligence to compose a complaint to or about them, and another 10% suspected that it had happened but couldn’t prove it.

While not eye-popping numbers, those percentages still add up to a sizable number of complaints and a good amount of time needed to respond to them.

The vast majority—three-quarters of survey respondents—said to their knowledge, parents and students had never used AI tools to compose a complaint to or about them. Ten percent of Ķvlog said they had received complaints but were certain they were not written with AI.

District and school leaders were more likely than teachers to report receiving AI-generated complaints. Nineteen percent of district leaders and 16% of school leaders said that “yes, definitely,” they had received an AI-drafted complaint. Another 19% of district leaders and 14% of school leaders said they suspected that parents or students had used AI to compose a complaint. Among teachers, 2% said they were certain they had received an AI-composed complaint and 8% suspected they had.

One in four Ķvlog reported that it took them more time to respond to a complaint they knew or suspected was composed with AI than it would to address a regular complaint. Part of the reason is that complaints written with AI can have a very legalistic tone and indiscriminately reference a litany of potential legal issues. This causes school and district staff (and their lawyers) to sink hours of time into responding to what might normally only take a few minutes, school and district leaders previously told Education Week. One superintendent estimated that complaints that once might have taken 15 minutes to review and respond to can now take three to four hours of staff time, not counting a lawyer’s time.

Even if an email has all the hallmarks of being AI-generated, legal and communication experts in education advise that teachers, and school and district leaders should respond to these complaints in the same way they would any other complaint.

Tips for identifying an AI-composed complaint

What clues tipped Ķvlog off that the complaints they received were written by AI? The EdWeek Research Center asked survey respondents to share their experiences.

Complaints that were overly long and detailed—or were filled with legal terms or long dashes—often raised Ķvlog’ suspicions.

“There are long hyphens in the text, and the language was too ornate,” said an Arizona high school teacher who works in a digital arts program.

See also

 Customer using online service with chat bot, virtual assistant.
Getty

A flag for some Ķvlog was when parents’ or students’ vocabulary, tone, or grammar in the complaint didn’t match up with their previous written messages.

An assistant superintendent from California who was certain one complaint was AI-generated and indicated that it took longer than usual to respond, wrote: “The language used was much more academic and the complaint was unnecessarily complex and lengthy.”

A couple of respondents reported that they had run complaints through AI-detection tools, and one educator said a parent admitted using ChatGPT to craft a complaint.

Other red flags are responses that come too quickly or those that don’t stay on topic.

“Responses that come faster than the response could have been composed without help,” wrote a district administrator from Virginia who works in technology.

And a special education district administrator from Washington state wrote: “The language in the complaint was uncharacteristically comprehensive and did not align with the parent’s concerns. Additionally, the language was more technical than would be expected from a layperson. We responded as we would with any complaint by investigating the situation and crafting a comprehensive response.”

education week logo subbrand logo RC RGB

Data analysis for this article was provided by the EdWeek Research Center. Learn more about the center’s work.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by 
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Climb: A New Framework for Career Readiness in the Age of AI
Discover practical strategies to redefine career readiness in K–12 and move beyond credentials to develop true capability and character.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Artificial Intelligence How AI Could Help or Hurt Student Testing
There's a balance to strike that uses AI to improve assessments and keep humans in charge, experts say.
4 min read
TeachersAI SG01
Teachers attend a training session on using artificial intelligence at American Federation of Teachers headquarters in New York City on March 18, 2026. The union has partnered with AI developers to train 400,000 teachers on AI use in the classroom. One question teachers face is how best to use the technology as part of testing students' subject mastery.
Salwan Georges for Education Week
Artificial Intelligence Q&A How a School Uses AI to Address Student Behavior Problems
AI has helped streamline the development of behavior intervention plans, a school leader said.
4 min read
032026 AI SEL support 2162238913
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + DigitalVision Vectors
Artificial Intelligence Teachers Move Beyond AI Basics to More Sophisticated Instructional Uses
A national AI training academy introduces teachers to complex collaboration with the technology.
5 min read
TeachersAI SG21
Teachers participate in a team exercise at the first training session of the National Academy for AI Instruction on March 18, 2026, at UFT headquarters in New York City. The partnership between the American Federation of Teachers and major AI developers aims to train 400,000 teachers to use artificial intelligence in the classroom.
Salwan Georges for Education Week
Artificial Intelligence Opinion Why Teachers Shouldn’t Offload Their Busywork to AI
The idea that AI can let teachers carve out more time for students is appealing, intuitive—and wrong.
Daniel Buck
4 min read
AI chip hype concept, GPU. Red microchips with AI printed on falling off a production line.
Education Week + iStock