As schools battle heightened levels of chronic absenteeism, researchers say the way they talk about attendance can affect students鈥� and families鈥� efforts to turn around patterns of missed school days.
For one, how parents interpret school attendance policies can affect whether or not they properly report absences that may be considered excused for reasons like illness or bereavement, researchers
Absences improperly categorized as unexcused can lead to harsher consequences, like withheld credits or a restriction on makeup work, which can make it difficult to get students back on track, said the report by researchers from the University of Tennessee, the University of California, Davis, and Attendance Works, a national organization that promotes tracking and addressing poor school attendance.
鈥淚f there isn鈥檛 this kind of trust built between teachers and parents, parents and the schools, then the kind of messaging that schools develop around attendance may not resonate with parents,鈥� said UC Davis education professor Kevin Gee, who coauthored the report.
Analyzing three years of California attendance data, Gee and his coauthors found Black and Latino students and students labeled as socioeconomically disadvantaged in the state鈥檚 data system had a larger percentage of their absences labeled as unexcused compared to their peers in other demographic groups.
That may be in part because of varying levels of familiarity with school policies among parents鈥攁nd different approaches to communicating those policies, the report said. The researchers drew those conclusions after an analysis of web pages and student handbooks for a random sampling of 40 high schools and middle schools throughout the state.
Here are a few ways researchers said schools鈥� messages on attendance may miss the mark.
Messages that focus on consequences, not support
Messages to families about attendance policies should focus on support, not just consequences for truancy or persistent absences, the authors wrote.
The analysis of school messages included a comparison of schools with largely socioeconomically disadvantaged students鈥攁 term that describes students with a number of household factors, including parents without high school diplomas, participation in free and reduced-price school meal programs, and homelessness.
鈥淲e found that the websites and student handbooks of the high-poverty, racially segregated schools communicated more punitive policies than the websites and handbooks of the more affluent schools,鈥� the analysis said. 鈥淪imilarly, the socioeconomically disadvantaged schools were more likely to publish policies stating that truancy would result in suspension of driver鈥檚 licenses, loss of school privileges like extracurricular participation, and Saturday school or in-school detention.鈥�
While some schools with high enrollments of students from low-income families posted outdated references to state law and jargon-heavy policies about punishment for truancy, wealthier schools took a more supportive approach, the analysis found. In one example, a school鈥檚 attendance page included a photo of a smiling concierge waiting to serve a customer.
Policies that are unclear or inaccessible to parents
Some students have higher percentages of their absences labeled unexcused because their parents have less experience interacting with school policies and practices, the authors said.
But schools don鈥檛 always do a good job of helping families navigate the system, the analysis found. In some cases, policies on attendance weren鈥檛 available at all on school or district web pages or in student handbooks. In others, it focused mostly on state law and not practical steps for parents to report and address missed school days.
Attendance Works advocates for materials that are available in multiple languages, if necessary, and available in multiple forms, including online, in materials sent home to parents, and in regular campaigns to encourage school attendance.
A focus on perfect attendance, rather than building better habits
Gone are the days of gold stars for perfect attendance.
If a student is motivated by attendance awards, one sick day or unavoidable absence can take them out of the running and weaken the incentive, Hedy Chang, executive director of Attendance Works, told Education Week in December.
鈥淲hen kids and families face real barriers and we don鈥檛 offer supports, then you鈥檙e just further having kids feel like, 鈥極h, I鈥檓 facing a struggle and I can never be part of a school community,鈥� and creating greater disconnection,鈥� Chang said. 鈥淧erfect attendance awards can be counterproductive and discouraging for these students. It鈥檚 the relationships that matter.鈥�
