Ķvlog

Ed-Tech Policy

Ed. Dept. Recommends These 3 Principles to Develop School Cellphone Policies

By Alyson Klein — December 03, 2024 4 min read
Photograph of a white teen using a cellphone in the classroom.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Every district and school in the country should have a policy addressing whether—and how—students can use cellphones in school, the U.S. Department of Education recommends in new

The department doesn’t take a position on whether schools should ban cellphones, allow them to be used at certain times of the day or in certain circumstances, or permit them for every student. Instead, the agency offered district-level examples of all three approaches.

And it recommends that cellphone policies be developed in close consultation with students, teachers, community members, and parents, outlining in a playbook what that process could look like.

The department’s move is part of a growing push among policymakers to set some parameters around cellphone use in schools. At least 18 states have passed laws or enacted policies that ban or restrict students’ use of cellphones in schools statewide or recommend local districts enact their own bans or restrictive policies, according to an Education Week analysis.

“Within each state’s guardrails, every elementary, middle, and high school should have a clear, consistent, and research-informed policy to guide the use of cellphones in schools,” said Miguel Cardona, the secretary of education, in a letter included with the playbook. “And that policy should reflect the insights and the engagement of Ķvlog, parents, and students.”

The guidance—which is steadfastly neutral on whether or not cellphones should be restricted in schools—comes as Cardona and the rest of the Biden team prepare to hand over the reins of the department to the incoming Trump administration.

Key questions to ask when crafting a cellphone policy

The playbook directs schools to consider questions such as:

  • When can students have access to phones?
  • When is phone use not permitted?
  • When and how are phones stored?
  • What are the appropriate consequences when a student doesn’t follow a school cellphone policy?
  • Who is responsible for monitoring and enforcing policies?
  • How can school districts and schools assess whether policies are working and how to refine them?

“Answering these questions can be complicated, but we know this: The best way to implement a policy that teachers, parents, and students will support and honor is to engage them in answering these questions,” Cardona wrote.

The department’s playbook focuses on three key principles for developing cellphone policies:

  1. Bringing students and parents to the table in designing a cellphone policy is likely to enhance buy-in and bolster the chances for success.
  2. Teachers, school leaders, and students should be aware of the policy. School and classroom culture should be built around it.
  3. Any device policy should be paired with lessons on digital citizenship.

The playbook includes some practical advice for building teams of students, teachers, and parents that can work together on crafting a cellphone policy. For instance, school and district leaders shouldn’t insist that students use their formal title (i.e. “principal” or “superintendent”) during discussions of the issue, because that might make students feel their input isn’t as valuable as the adults’. Instead, everyone directly involved in crafting the policy should adopt the same title, perhaps “designer” or “policymaker.”

And school leaders should consider looking beyond the student council president in choosing kids to serve on a committee or panel charged with cellphone policy development. Students who may struggle with cellphone restrictions—or unfettered access to devices—may bring a special perspective.

The guidance also recommends that the teams crafting cellphone policies read and discuss articles on the topic (think of it like a book club, the department suggests). And it recommends giving parents, teachers, and students the space to share their own experiences with cellphones.

Parents have been among the biggest critics of outright cellphone bans.

Even so, the National Parents Union, a nonprofit parent advocacy organization that seeks to raise the influence of parents’ voices in K-12 decisionmaking, applauded the guidance.

This “approach prioritizes students’ focus and learning during critical instructional time—while also acknowledging the real and valid concerns that parents have about maintaining lines of communication with their children and contact during emergency situations,” the organization wrote in a statement.

Students are more likely to honor a policy if they helped create it

The department’s recommendation that students play a key role in crafting school or district cellphone polices jibes with Kristy Zaleta’s experience. Zaleta, the principal of Rogers Park Middle School in Danbury, Conn., convened both students and parents to help develop her school’s cellphone policy, which is now in its third year.

Students were part of the committee that wrote the policy, and it was shared with all students so they could comment on it, Zaleta said.

At first, the school allowed individual teachers to come up with their own expectations around cellphones in their classrooms, she said. But that became a headache for both students and teachers; teachers were tasked with enforcing their individual policies while students had to deal with a wide range of expectations on phones.

Now, students must keep their cellphones in their backpacks or in a classroom cellphone caddy during instruction, Zaleta said. That’s prompted more in-person interaction during social times, she said.

Zaleta understands why students need a seat at the table on an issue that affects them so directly.

“I don’t like when I have things just dictated to me,” she said. “It definitely helps when people feel like they have a voice.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
The Road to Opportunity: Making CTE Accessible for All
The most valuable CTE happens off campus. For too many students, transportation is the barrier that keeps opportunity out of reach.
Content provided by HopSkipDrive
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
New Hire, No Laptop, No Login: Preventing Day-One Disruption
What happens before day one matters. Discover how districts are improving the new hire experience.
Content provided by 
Teaching Profession K-12 Essentials Forum Supporting the New K-12 Workforce: What Teachers Need to Stay at School
 Join this free virtual event to discover what teachers say they need to feel supported to stay in classrooms for the long haul.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Education Groups Say New E-Rate Bidding Portal Will Hurt Small Districts Hardest
Supporters of the measure say it will create a more transparent bidding process.
3 min read
Chairman Brendan Carr testifies before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Communications and Technology oversight hearing of the Federal Communications Commission at Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr testifies during a House committee oversight hearing of the FCC in Washington, on Jan. 14, 2026. Some education organizations opposed a measure the FCC recently approved to create a new bidding portal for federal E-rate funds.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Schools Have Another Year to Make Websites Accessible. Why That Matters
People with disabilities say inaccessible online content is a barrier to participating in public life.
4 min read
A gif with web accessible icons around a computer screen with a magnifying glass.
Shivendu Jauhari/Getty
Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week